You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 7, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hi, i'm working through implementing the DCSA standards as a base for a Forwarding platform, during this process to move towards adoption there are some things not covered in the Shipping Instruction dataset.
These are from real cases where data is flowing today using EDIFACT IFTMIN (shipping instruction) and the data comes from a shipper with instructions in Free Text (FTX segments in IFTMIN). Most of these instructions are to outline expectations of the Bill of Lading and easily handled such as:
B/L must show the freight costs!
Date Shipped On Board should be mentioned in the consignee and notify box
BUT to migrate to using DCSA standards there are a few points missing mainly related to the dangerous goods elements as these are chemicals some are dangerous goods others are not.
So handling remarks such as:
B/L must show IMDG-class and UN number in case of dangerous goods cargo.
Are difficult as the Dangerous Goods don't appear as yet to be covered under 3.0.0-Beta-1 are there plans to include these as their own attributes in the DCSA IM and EBL or should we be adding them to the Marks or Descriptions fields?
For these DG bookings we also have to send paper DG Notes by email, so feel it would be a best to include in the DCSA IM, appreciate some topics are still a WIP but welcome thoughts on above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the pointer @raisoman much appreciated!, this has the key elements i'm looking for
As this is in the booking process, am I right to work on the assumption that the DG information will only be provided at booking stage, or are there plans to also include the same DG attributes at shipping instruction stage, which maybe providing updated information?
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi, i'm working through implementing the DCSA standards as a base for a Forwarding platform, during this process to move towards adoption there are some things not covered in the Shipping Instruction dataset.
These are from real cases where data is flowing today using EDIFACT IFTMIN (shipping instruction) and the data comes from a shipper with instructions in Free Text (
FTX
segments in IFTMIN). Most of these instructions are to outline expectations of the Bill of Lading and easily handled such as:BUT to migrate to using DCSA standards there are a few points missing mainly related to the dangerous goods elements as these are chemicals some are dangerous goods others are not.
So handling remarks such as:
Are difficult as the Dangerous Goods don't appear as yet to be covered under
3.0.0-Beta-1
are there plans to include these as their own attributes in the DCSA IM and EBL or should we be adding them to the Marks or Descriptions fields?For these DG bookings we also have to send paper DG Notes by email, so feel it would be a best to include in the DCSA IM, appreciate some topics are still a WIP but welcome thoughts on above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: