Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparing to existing SZ cluster catalogs from experiments #10

Open
bnord opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Comparing to existing SZ cluster catalogs from experiments #10

bnord opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@bnord
Copy link
Contributor

bnord commented Apr 27, 2023

No description provided.

@bnord bnord added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 27, 2023
@bnord bnord added this to the alpha release milestone Jun 19, 2023
@bnord
Copy link
Contributor Author

bnord commented Jun 19, 2023

  1. Which existing cluster catalogs should we get?
  2. Should this be just real-sky data or should we also get simulated benchmarks like the WMAP/NASA site ones?
  3. I think this task would involve the following subtasks
    4. download big data sets
    5. convert to a standard format for our purposes, like h5 probably
    6. store in the Fermilab cloud for ease of use by anyone

@evavagiakis
Copy link
Collaborator

  1. This depends on which experiments we are claiming to simulate; ACT-like data will be compared to ACT, SPT-like to SPT
  2. Not yet decided
  3. In the case of Y-M distributions I agree, if we are doing a smaller number of submap-only tests for image plotting I'm not sure the data sets will be large.
    5,6) If the simulations and real data are already publicly available I do not think we need to convert them to additional data formats and post them again for the public

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants