Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove log_replay_iter and process_batch in scan::log_replay #402

Merged

Conversation

zachschuermann
Copy link
Collaborator

as titled, leftover code we can clean up. and remove dependency on either!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the breaking-change Change that will require a version bump label Oct 16, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.34%. Comparing base (313272e) to head (32319fa).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #402      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.99%   78.34%   +0.34%     
==========================================
  Files          49       49              
  Lines       10328    10282      -46     
  Branches    10328    10282      -46     
==========================================
  Hits         8055     8055              
+ Misses       1821     1775      -46     
  Partials      452      452              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@nicklan nicklan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

setup_batch_process is now only called by process_scan_batch. It's maybe okay that it's in its own function, be we should update it to be (maybe) called get_scan_adds and update the comment.

@scovich
Copy link
Collaborator

scovich commented Oct 16, 2024

setup_batch_process is now only called by process_scan_batch. It's maybe okay that it's in its own function, be we should update it to be (maybe) called get_scan_adds and update the comment.

I'm in the middle of prototyping a complete rework of this logic that would depend on this change. Let's pick up naming issues there?

Copy link
Collaborator

@scovich scovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yay for deletes!

@zachschuermann zachschuermann merged commit 025aba8 into delta-io:main Oct 16, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking-change Change that will require a version bump
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants