Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better to have slides on proper archival site, get DOI, and just list here #18

Open
labarba opened this issue Jul 16, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@labarba
Copy link

labarba commented Jul 16, 2018

It may be too late for this year, but let me say that I don't think posting all the slides in a GitHub repo is a great idea. It would be much better for authors to deposit their slides in a proper archival site, get a DOI, and use the GitHub repo to simply list the presentations, with complete citation including their DOI.

I, for one, prefer not to add my slides on this repo, as I already have uploaded them to Figshare, so the citation is:

Barba, Lorena A. (2018): Engineers Code: re-usable, open educational modules for engineering undergraduates. figshare. Presentation. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6818279.v1

@leouieda
Copy link
Contributor

@labarba I agree and I did the same. I also noticed that a few of the posters in the README are DOI links to zenodo and F1000, so clearly some people are already doing this and got merged.

Do you think linking using the DOI is enough or would it have to be a full citation?

@labarba
Copy link
Author

labarba commented Aug 14, 2018

It's always a good idea to remind people how you want your work to be cited (many people don't know!).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants