You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a Deno workspace, with some members being not intended for publishing. They serve more as a helper to organize the workspace. Specifically, some of them only define tasks in their deno.json and nothing else.
When I run deno publish, Deno complains that some workspace members do not have version field specified, and yes, it is on purpose.
Request
I would like to have something like the private: true field in package.json, which is respected e.g by PNPM & pnpm publish. Then, I can explicitly mark packages as private and deno publish should not take them into account.
Alternatively, it could be configured in the root deno.json's publish config. I tried to use publish.exclude, but it has a different purpose.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Use case
I have a Deno workspace, with some members being not intended for publishing. They serve more as a helper to organize the workspace. Specifically, some of them only define
tasks
in theirdeno.json
and nothing else.When I run
deno publish
, Deno complains that some workspace members do not haveversion
field specified, and yes, it is on purpose.Request
I would like to have something like the
private: true
field inpackage.json
, which is respected e.g by PNPM &pnpm publish
. Then, I can explicitly mark packages as private anddeno publish
should not take them into account.Alternatively, it could be configured in the root
deno.json
's publish config. I tried to usepublish.exclude
, but it has a different purpose.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: