Review code and validate existing Flash/Special Issue logic

[mackhowell-nava]

Issue Description

[Notes from 01/28/25 Sprint Planning]

• We've talked with NWQ/MAS about validating that the logic in place for existing F/SI logic is accurate and still makes sense.
• We want to do this because the existing F/SIs seem to have been added in piecemeal/haphazard fashion.
• EXISTING FLASHES: Homeless, Hardship, Terminally Ill, Priority Processing, POW
• EXISTING SPECIAL ISSUES: POW, EMP, PACT
• (could it be that there are more than these? how deep should we dig?)

---

Tasks

• What work is necessary for this story to be completed?

Acceptance Criteria

• What will be created or happen as a result of this story?

---

How to configure this issue

• Attached to an Epic (what body of work is this a part of?)
• Labeled with Practice Area (engineer, data science, design, research , product)
• Labeled with Type (bug, request, discovery, documentation, etc.)