You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Mirabai. The issue template does not account grammatically for multiple misstroke entries.
It's annoying to edit the issue template every time I find more than one misstroke for one word. The current issue template reads:
Hello! Thanks for contributing! Your contribution will help new stenographers learn stenography and have a much better experience while they learn. Before you submit this issue, please check existing open and closed issues to make sure there are no duplicates. Feel free to use this template or start from scratch.
Dictionary
I noticed this dictionary entry or these dictionary entries in:
dict.json
dict-en-AU-with-extra-stroke.json
Misstroked entry or entries
This looks like a misstroke or could otherwise be better:
It is consistent with the main.json dictionary from Plover 3.
The phonetic stroke for "stroke" is written using STROEBG, which is consistent with the strokes used for "brushstroke", "heatstroke", and "sunstroke".
Mirabai says…
Even better
To make this even better, we could:
Remove the entry completely because it can already be stroked without its own entry. It is not a common phrase so it does not need to appear in dictionary look up searches.
Remove the stroke STROBG for "stroke" to be consistent with others, even though it is common in Plover theory to use the single vowel letter stroke when there's no other adjacent vowel in the translation.
There should be accomodations and the issue template can be made more compact, like this:
Hello! Thanks for contributing! Your contribution will help new stenographers learn stenography and have a much better experience while they learn. Before you submit this issue, please check existing open and closed issues to make sure there are no duplicates. Feel free to use this template or start from scratch.
Dictionary
I noticed this dictionary entry in:
dict.json
Misstroked entry
This looks like a misstroke or could otherwise be better:
It is consistent with the main.json dictionary from Plover 3.
The phonetic stroke for "stroke" is written using STROEBG, which is consistent with the strokes used for "brushstroke", "heatstroke", and "sunstroke".
Mirabai says…
Even better
To make this even better, we could:
Remove the entry completely because it can already be stroked without its own entry. It is not a common phrase so it does not need to appear in dictionary look up searches.
Remove the stroke STROBG for "stroke" to be consistent with others, even though it is common in Plover theory to use the single vowel letter stroke when there's no other adjacent vowel in the translation.
and
Hello! Thanks for contributing! Your contribution will help new stenographers learn stenography and have a much better experience while they learn. Before you submit this issue, please check existing open and closed issues to make sure there are no duplicates. Feel free to use this template or start from scratch.
Dictionary
I noticed these dictionary entries in:
dict.json
dict-en-AU-with-extra-stroke.json
Misstroked entries
These looks like misstrokes or could otherwise be better:
It is consistent with the main.json dictionary from Plover 3.
The phonetic stroke for "stroke" is written using STROEBG, which is consistent with the strokes used for "brushstroke", "heatstroke", and "sunstroke".
Mirabai says…
Even better
To make these even better, we could:
Remove entries completely because they can already be stroked without their own entries. They're not a common phrase so they don'y need to appear in dictionary look up searches.
Remove the stroke STROBG for "stroke" to be consistent with others, even though it is common in Plover theory to use the single vowel letter stroke when there's no other adjacent vowel in the translation.
Also, there needs to be a default title, like:
example misstroke entry misstrokes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Mirabai. The issue template does not account grammatically for multiple misstroke entries.
It's annoying to edit the issue template every time I find more than one misstroke for one word. The current issue template reads:
There should be accomodations and the issue template can be made more compact, like this:
and
Also, there needs to be a default title, like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: