Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configuration Template Archive / Template Selector #18

Open
metacontext opened this issue May 10, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Configuration Template Archive / Template Selector #18

metacontext opened this issue May 10, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@metacontext
Copy link
Member

It would be great if users could submit configuration templates for standardized RDF extractions (like TEI/EpiDoc > CIDOC-CRM etc.) to a common template archive so that other users can find and use them more easily. We could even have some kind of "template selector" for standard use cases. This would improve the usability of the service quite a lot.

@KollatzThomas
Copy link
Member

Great idea already work in progress based on @metacontext 2016 DARIAH workshop example, enriched by @KollatzThomas for epigraphy.info Workshop IV, current plan is to evaluate epiont-proposal by Luizzo and others and enrich XTriples Configuration template

@awagner-mainz
Copy link
Member

Should these go in (a subfolder of?) the examples directory? or maybe a separate repository?
Excellent idea, it should be possible to clean up some of Salamanca's config files rather quickly...

@metacontext
Copy link
Member Author

My suggestion would be: New subfolder "templates", new page "Configuration Templates" in main menu (= page with a list with teasers and short descriptions for each configuration template). Interested parties can submitt pull requests to the folder and the overview HTML page. If the template passes schema conformance, it gets merged and included. Additionally, we could introduce a new select box in the XTriples form on the main page from which included templates can be selected for the extraction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants