From a19e821655930b73a603655535ec42746b16e6b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troels Henriksen Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:42:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Another typo fix. --- blog/2024-07-17-opencl-cuda-hip.md | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/blog/2024-07-17-opencl-cuda-hip.md b/blog/2024-07-17-opencl-cuda-hip.md index 3fd4be6..01f6ca0 100644 --- a/blog/2024-07-17-opencl-cuda-hip.md +++ b/blog/2024-07-17-opencl-cuda-hip.md @@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ analytical models and assumptions. One common suspicion I can definitely *reject* is that NVIDIA does not seem to arbitrarily sabotage OpenCL on their hardware. While NVIDIA -clearly doesn't main OpenCL to nearly the same level as CUDA (frankly, -*neither does AMD these days*), this manifests itself as OpenCL not -growing any new features, rather than the code generation being poor. +clearly doesn't maintain OpenCL to nearly the same level as CUDA +(frankly, *neither does AMD these days*), this manifests itself as +OpenCL not growing any new features, rather than the code generation +being poor.