You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In case we have multiple workers, they should perform in a certain ratio (equal in case of symmetric configuration). Let's add a check for that which means yielding another result per each test result:
(means that the average ratio was off by 3%; using absolute values to avoid masking values; eg. 25:25:25:25 ratio where real ratio is 24.25:25.75:25:25 would result in -3%:+3%:0%:0%, therefore (3+3+0+0)/4 = 1.5)
Later we might even include quality of mean_ratio that would signal how frequently is the ratio broken during the test execution (for tests that are sampling throughout the test execution):
In case we have multiple workers, they should perform in a certain ratio (equal in case of symmetric configuration). Let's add a check for that which means yielding another result per each test result:
(means that the average ratio was off by 3%; using absolute values to avoid masking values; eg. 25:25:25:25 ratio where real ratio is 24.25:25.75:25:25 would result in -3%:+3%:0%:0%, therefore (3+3+0+0)/4 = 1.5)
Later we might even include quality of
mean_ratio
that would signal how frequently is the ratio broken during the test execution (for tests that are sampling throughout the test execution):Similar to
mean_ratio
only calculated per each sample (at time 0, 1, 2, 3...) throughout the test execution.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: