Build error against v0.6.1/v0.6.2b of Rack API

[573]

Ubuntu 16.04
Rack v0.6.1
Plugin git branch master

rack_plugins_1 | g++ -Wsuggest-override -std=c++11 -DSLUG=MrLumps -fPIC -I../../include -I../../dep/include -DVERSION=0.6.0 -MMD -MP -g -O3 -march=nocona -ffast-math -fno-finite-math-only -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -DARCH_LIN -c -o build/src/SEQEuclid.cpp.o src/SEQEuclid.cpp
rack_plugins_1 | src/SEQEuclid.cpp: In member function 'void SEQEuclid::Bank::Reset()':
rack_plugins_1 | src/SEQEuclid.cpp:113:12: error: 'struct rack::PulseGenerator' has no member named 'pulseTime'
rack_plugins_1 | gate.pulseTime = 0.0f;
rack_plugins_1 | ^
rack_plugins_1 | src/SEQEuclid.cpp: In member function 'virtual void SEQEuclid::step()':
rack_plugins_1 | src/SEQEuclid.cpp:271:18: error: 'struct rack::PulseGenerator' has no member named 'pulseTime'
rack_plugins_1 | bank1.gate.pulseTime = 0.0f;
rack_plugins_1 | ^
rack_plugins_1 | src/SEQEuclid.cpp:275:18: error: 'struct rack::PulseGenerator' has no member named 'pulseTime'
rack_plugins_1 | bank2.gate.pulseTime = 0.0f;
rack_plugins_1 | ^
rack_plugins_1 | src/SEQEuclid.cpp:279:18: error: 'struct rack::PulseGenerator' has no member named 'pulseTime'
rack_plugins_1 | bank3.gate.pulseTime = 0.0f;
rack_plugins_1 | ^
rack_plugins_1 | src/SEQEuclid.cpp:283:18: error: 'struct rack::PulseGenerator' has no member named 'pulseTime'
rack_plugins_1 | bank4.gate.pulseTime = 0.0f;
rack_plugins_1 | ^
rack_plugins_1 | src/SEQEuclid.cpp:226:15: warning: unused variable 'lightLambda' [-Wunused-variable]
rack_plugins_1 | const float lightLambda = 0.075f;
rack_plugins_1 | ^
rack_plugins_1 | ../../compile.mk:64: recipe for target 'build/src/SEQEuclid.cpp.o' failed
rack_plugins_1 | make: *** [build/src/SEQEuclid.cpp.o] Error 1

[djpeterso23662]

Thanks for posting your issue Daniel! I apologize for being slow responding. My Budgie Linux build is still at VCV Rack 0.5 so it will be a bit before I can attempt to duplicate your issue. If you have moved up to 0.6.2b, would you please let me know if you have the same issue? I will post as soon as I can. Thanks again!

[573]

@djpeterso23662 , thanks and absolutely no problem! I think we all spend fair amounts of our spare time in cool stuff like this, so ...

My build against tags/v0.6.2b so far states no different output, thus issue seems the same.

[djpeterso23662]

Okay, Daniel, thanks for confirming. I appreciate it!