Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ls: mmcblk*: No such file or directory #57

Open
TJYSunset opened this issue Nov 8, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

ls: mmcblk*: No such file or directory #57

TJYSunset opened this issue Nov 8, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@TJYSunset
Copy link

Host OS: Windows 10 Professional 15063.674
Device: Moto Z (aka griffin aka XT1650-05), China model
Output of tetherback --verbose:

tetherback v0.9.1
Found ADB version 1.0.39
Using default transfer method: adb exec-out pipe (--exec-out)
Device reports kernel 3.18.31-perf-g661294a-dirty
Device reports TWRP version 3.1.1-0
ls: mmcblk*: No such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Users\[username removed]\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python36-32\Scripts\tetherback-script.py", line 11, in <module>
    load_entry_point('tetherback==0.9.1', 'console_scripts', 'tetherback')()
  File "c:\users\[username removed]\appdata\local\programs\python\python36-32\lib\site-packages\tetherback\tetherback.py", line 322, in main
    partmap = build_partmap(adb)
  File "c:\users\[username removed]\appdata\local\programs\python\python36-32\lib\site-packages\tetherback\tetherback.py", line 133, in build_partmap
    mmcblks = adb.check_output(('shell','cd /sys/block; ls -d mmcblk*')).split()
  File "c:\users\[username removed]\appdata\local\programs\python\python36-32\lib\site-packages\tetherback\adb_wrapper.py", line 35, in check_output
    return sp.check_output(self.adbcmd(adbargs), universal_newlines=un, **kwargs)
  File "c:\users\[username removed]\appdata\local\programs\python\python36-32\lib\subprocess.py", line 336, in check_output
    **kwargs).stdout
  File "c:\users\[username removed]\appdata\local\programs\python\python36-32\lib\subprocess.py", line 418, in run
    output=stdout, stderr=stderr)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '('adb', '-d', 'shell', 'cd /sys/block; ls -d mmcblk*')' returned non-zero exit status 1.

Output of adb shell mount:

rootfs on / type rootfs (rw,seclabel,size=1819536k,nr_inodes=454884)
tmpfs on /dev type tmpfs (rw,seclabel,nosuid,relatime,size=1917320k,nr_inodes=479330,mode=755)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,seclabel,relatime,mode=600)
proc on /proc type proc (rw,relatime,gid=3009,hidepid=2)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,seclabel,relatime)
selinuxfs on /sys/fs/selinux type selinuxfs (rw,relatime)
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,seclabel,relatime,size=1917320k,nr_inodes=479330)
pstore on /sys/fs/pstore type pstore (rw,seclabel,relatime)
adb on /dev/usb-ffs/adb type functionfs (rw,relatime)
/dev/block/sda19 on /cache type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)
/dev/block/dm-0 on /data type f2fs (rw,seclabel,relatime,background_gc=on,user_xattr,acl,inline_data,extent_cache,active_logs=6)
/dev/block/dm-0 on /sdcard type f2fs (rw,seclabel,relatime,background_gc=on,user_xattr,acl,inline_data,extent_cache,active_logs=6)
/dev/block/sda15 on /system type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)

Output of adb shell "ls /sys/block":

dm-0 
loop0
loop1
loop2
loop3
loop4
loop5
loop6
loop7
ram0 
ram1 
ram10
ram11
ram12
ram13
ram14
ram15
ram2 
ram3 
ram4 
ram5 
ram6 
ram7 
ram8 
ram9 
sda  
sdb  
sdc  
sdd  
zram0

Not sure why these blocks aren't starting with "mmcblk", but this could be a problem.

@ckrmml
Copy link
Contributor

ckrmml commented Oct 24, 2018

Huawei P20Pro (Clt-L29) /sys/block looks the same and fails with the same error

@dlenski
Copy link
Owner

dlenski commented Nov 26, 2018

Not sure why these blocks aren't starting with "mmcblk", but this could be a problem.

I believe this is very similar to the situation of #39. Do the sd* subdirectories contain individual partitions?

One reason that I've semi-abandoned this project is because it turns out that there are too many different partitioning approaches on Android devices, and without access to the devices themselves or some very detailed database of how they all handle it… I can't keep up.

If you are interested in writing and testing a PR that can allow tetherback to map partitions with a different naming convention, we can incorporate it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants