You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently there is no flexibility in naming the stage schema which defaults to {name}_STAGING. While this is great for general use, it might be beneficial to give users the flexibility to define their own name for the staging schema.
Are you a dlt user?
Yes, I'm already a dlt user.
Use case
Internally we have a strict naming standards for our schemas in Snowflake which prevents the implementation of dlt. With this in place, it would allow dlt to be implemented in stacks where naming standards are strict.
Proposed solution
I think from an implementation side, it might be beneficial to add it in the pipeline declaration
Feature description
Currently there is no flexibility in naming the stage schema which defaults to
{name}_STAGING
. While this is great for general use, it might be beneficial to give users the flexibility to define their own name for the staging schema.Are you a dlt user?
Yes, I'm already a dlt user.
Use case
Internally we have a strict naming standards for our schemas in Snowflake which prevents the implementation of dlt. With this in place, it would allow dlt to be implemented in stacks where naming standards are strict.
Proposed solution
I think from an implementation side, it might be beneficial to add it in the pipeline declaration
Related issues
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: