Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update essential-syntax.md #2786

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

Update essential-syntax.md #2786

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

thimanshu1993
Copy link
Contributor

Added an explanation of Left, Top, Right, and Bottom value ordering in XAML syntax.

Added an explanation of Left, Top, Right, and Bottom value ordering in XAML syntax.
@bhavanesh2001
Copy link
Contributor

bhavanesh2001 commented Feb 14, 2025

I'm not sure if this is necessary here. A detailed explanation of this is already available here

@davidbritch
Copy link
Contributor

@bhavanesh2001 Yeah, I'd recommend just replacing what you added with a link to the relevant section of the doc you identified.

@thimanshu1993
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @davidbritch,

Thank you for your valuable feedback! My intention was to provide readers with a bit more clarity upfront. Given that the title is "Essential XAML Syntax," I felt that, from a new user's perspective, this particular point had minimal explanation.

That said, I have incorporated your feedback and added a small note with a reference link. I hope this works well—please let me know if any further refinements are needed.

Thanks again!

Copy link
Contributor

@davidbritch davidbritch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@davidbritch davidbritch merged commit 4ce92fc into dotnet:main Feb 19, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants