Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build support for unknown archs - Loongarch in my case #78797

Open
3 tasks
kant2002 opened this issue Nov 24, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
3 tasks

Build support for unknown archs - Loongarch in my case #78797

kant2002 opened this issue Nov 24, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@kant2002
Copy link
Contributor

kant2002 commented Nov 24, 2022

I'm building runtime on the Loongarch hardware and I discover that dotnet by itself very reliant on the arch-specific nugets.
Also even if I have SDK built for loongarch I still face some issues which is very delicate in nature.

For example self-contained apps require Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.linux-loongarch64 and Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-loongarch64. See dotnet/linker#3130 (comment)

/cc @shushanhf

@dotnet-issue-labeler
Copy link

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@ghost ghost added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Nov 24, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 24, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

I'm building runtime on the Loongarch hardware and I discover that dotnet by itself very reliant on the arch-specific nugets.
Also even if I have SDK built for loongarch I still face some issues which is very delicate in nature.

For example self-contained apps require Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.linux-loongarch64 and Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-loongarch64. See dotnet/linker#3130 (comment)

/cc @shushanhf

Author: kant2002
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-Infrastructure, untriaged, arch-loongarch64

Milestone: -

@shushanhf
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @jkotas
The https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet should be consider the LoongArch64.

Is there some discussion about it ?
Maybe my experience about construction the SDK3.1, SDK6.0, SDK7.0 for LoongArch is helpful.

@jkotas
Copy link
Member

jkotas commented Nov 25, 2022

dotnet/arcade#11584 is announcement for dotnet/dotnet. You can read more about that in the announcement. dotnet/arcade has the design documents and the discussions for dotnet/dotnet.

For example, Red Hat is building S390 port using https://github.com/dotnet/source-build today, and they will switch to dotnet/dotnet once it becomes ready. dotnet/dotnet is a better way to do source-build. I would expect that LoongArch64 can be on the same plan.

@jkotas
Copy link
Member

jkotas commented Nov 25, 2022

self-contained apps require Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.linux-loongarch64 and Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-loongarch64

dotnet/source-build#1215

@agocke agocke added this to the Future milestone Feb 13, 2023
@agocke agocke removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Feb 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants