-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 721
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG]: Horrible query performance #3001
Comments
I had a look at the code and tried to follow timings. I dont know why but thel query-call of const result = await import_tracing.tracer.startActiveSpan("drizzle.driver.execute", (span) => {
span?.setAttributes({
"drizzle.query.name": query.name,
"drizzle.query.text": query.text,
"drizzle.query.params": JSON.stringify(params)
});
return client.query(query, params);
}); Is the last drizzle-code building on top of the pg module. |
This is actually a problem with the pg module I am using as the driver for drizzle. Version |
Turns out there is another fix/workaround: Using Node v16 and the newest node-postgres (8.13.0) runs fine too. |
@francois-egner If it's an issue specific to the driver, it may be better to open an issue in the |
@L-Mario564 |
What version of
drizzle-orm
are you using?0.33.0
What version of
drizzle-kit
are you using?0.24.2
Describe the Bug
I am trying to run a simple aggregation query to count the existence of a record. The table to run the query against has only one entry. Querying against this table takes at least 40ms which is waaaaay to slow. Running the same query via psql or even the underlying pg-driver brings up query times around 1ms.
This is the code I used to compare raw pg querying vs drizzle orm:
Running the same raw query using
drizzle.execute(...)
results in the same 40-50ms of execution time.I cannot explain why drizzle makes is so damn slow. Those times are not acceptable.
Expected behavior
I expect the query time to be somewhat close to the raw pg-driver performance.
Environment & setup
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: