Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate github teams by semester #50

Open
1 of 2 tasks
janka102 opened this issue Dec 13, 2016 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Separate github teams by semester #50

janka102 opened this issue Dec 13, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@janka102
Copy link
Member

janka102 commented Dec 13, 2016

I believe suggested by @jakeloo, each semester should have a new team for dvcoders members. This makes it easier to remove old/inactive members if need be. Any other pros/cons?

Currently we just have Developers and Kernel.

Name suggestions:

  • Developers-[sem][yr], ex Developers-sp17

  • [sem][yr]-Developers, ex sp17-Developers

  • devs-[sem][yr], ex devs-sp17

  • devs-[semester]-[year], ex devs-spring-2017

  • Pretty much any variations of the above

  • Figure out if they can be automatically created or needs to be manually created

  • Update github signup code

@jakeloo
Copy link

jakeloo commented Dec 14, 2016

my vote, [group]-[semester]-[year] in lowercase.
developers-spring-2017

group creation: https://developer.github.com/v3/orgs/teams/#create-team

let's also rename Developers to developers-legacy or nuke it.
kernels can be kept the same, but moving forward (next semester) let's move it toward the new format.

@janka102
Copy link
Member Author

OK sounds good. Just changed the current one to legacy. Another question would be when do we starting adding to the next semesters' team. Like when is the cut off for putting people into Spring vs Fall teams. For Spring it could be after last day in December maybe? and Fall could be after last day in May.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants