You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In re#57. It might be an idea to have explicit int sizes when defining an interface.
At the moment, you have <c-int>, <c-short>et al, but libraries usually define an "int16", "int32", "uint16" etc. For clarity and ease, it would be nice to have direct analogues, <c-int32>, <c-int16>etc
I'm assuming that it's just a case of something like define constant <c-int16> = <c-short>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In re #57. It might be an idea to have explicit int sizes when defining an interface.
At the moment, you have
<c-int>
,<c-short>
et al, but libraries usually define an "int16", "int32", "uint16" etc. For clarity and ease, it would be nice to have direct analogues,<c-int32>
,<c-int16>
etcI'm assuming that it's just a case of something like
define constant <c-int16> = <c-short>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: