Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug with positioning on multi-display systems #12

Open
RChutchev opened this issue Mar 18, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Bug with positioning on multi-display systems #12

RChutchev opened this issue Mar 18, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@RChutchev
Copy link

Hi, we've been using your package for some time and found an error with the camera view-boxes on multi-display systems.

We have 4 monitors PC running on Windows 11 (64-bit) with AnotherRSTS (latest version).
Two of the four (left and right) are vertically rotated, and two central are horizontal. Like this, || -- -- || .

After every Windows restart camera view boxes are positioned on the second monitor (left horizontal one, || -+- -- ||), but I need these view boxes positioned on the left vertically rotated monitor (|+| -- -- ||). Every time I move every camera view box to another monitor, after Windows restart those view boxes reset position to the second monitor or even on the first (main) one.

That is so annoying because we have 8 camera streams simultaneously running on one computer (that's our master workstation and one monitor is reserved to view cameras from the whole building, that's a private house). This PC can be restarted up to two times a day for updates, software installation, or even power outages (after the UPC is discharged).
We've tried to edit the config file or fix this problem ourselves, but no luck.

@e1z0, could you please help to solve this problem?
I intend to Sponsor this work if you don't mind and turn this feature on (here in GitHub) or give a Patreon link or another known service to Sponsor your work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant