-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] weird test failure in CopyCollectionTest #4278
Comments
I see a different error in <testcase name="" classname="org.exist.repo.PackageTriggerTest" time="2.032">
<error type="java.io.IOException">
<![CDATA[java.io.IOException: storeDocument received a null InputStream when trying to store a Binary Document at org.exist.repo.PackageTriggerTest.setup(PackageTriggerTest.java:81)]]>
</error>
</testcase> mvn -v
Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home: /opt/homebrew/Cellar/maven/3.8.5/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_322, vendor: Azul Systems, Inc., runtime: /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/zulu-8.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Default locale: en_GB, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "12.3", arch: "aarch64", family: "mac" funnily : [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 10:05 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2022-03-22T11:42:00+01:00
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
@line-o looks like joe had the same error on ci #4269 (comment) |
(I didn't experience it myself - I just saw it in the GitHub Actions CI error logs.) |
so repeated the same with
the difference in the to sum up,
|
Today, with support from @duncdrum I was able to have a full successful test run on M1. |
What I did in order to get to a running setup was: git clean -dfX
mvn package |
When running the tests as part of the maven package goal these failures were reported on my machine.
update
The same issue was now also observed happening in CI by @joewiz
The weird thing is that it seems that the expected values are actually returned based on the output.
Context (please always complete the following information):
Additional context
conf.xml
? noneThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: