-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] binary
Attribute in Lucene full text fields does not work any more.
#5431
Comments
@scheidelerl Thank you for this complete issue report. I would like to know with which version of exist-db the above test-suite passes. |
In order to read values of binary fields a new function was added |
see also https://exist-db.org/exist/apps/doc/lucene#retrieve-fields "Retrieving Field Content" |
Hey, |
If I use only
And I know what it means, it's self-explanatory. |
@scheidelerl you need to have some hits in order to sort them using the binary field values. I suspect that your call to |
It can very well be, that the schema was not updated to add the binary attribute. |
I updated the test above and added a new one, one with and one without This brings me to the following questions:
!!!! → 6. What do I have to do if I only want to perform a query above the parent level and have several values in one field, but want to have faster access? |
As far as I know binary fields were added in version 6.2.0. That means it cannot work in version 5.4.0. |
Describe the bug
The use of
binary
attribute for fields in full text index does not work any more.Expected behavior
The use of the
binary
attribute should work.To Reproduce
Try to index a field with as
binary
.With binary:
Without binary:
Context (please always complete the following information)
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: