Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

autoconf is acceptable to deal with very legacy compilers? #9

Open
mpsuzuki opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

autoconf is acceptable to deal with very legacy compilers? #9

mpsuzuki opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@mpsuzuki
Copy link

Hi!
Before all, I appreciate your implementation of xxHash with plain C90 & C++98, thank you very much, it's very helpful to use xxHash in the legacy environment!!

I have a question, "autoconf is acceptable workaround for this project to deal with the legacy compilers?" In my case, I want to use the compiler GCC-4.6, which does not have "-Wpedantic" option. It might be possible for me to write a small checking by autoconf, to check the available options, and rewrite Makefile appropriately.

But I'm afraid this project is designed to be very simple (so Makefile checks gcc-or-clang by shell command in Makefile), and it might be the way you dislike. Please could you tell me whether there is any acceptable workaround for you?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant