You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi!
Before all, I appreciate your implementation of xxHash with plain C90 & C++98, thank you very much, it's very helpful to use xxHash in the legacy environment!!
I have a question, "autoconf is acceptable workaround for this project to deal with the legacy compilers?" In my case, I want to use the compiler GCC-4.6, which does not have "-Wpedantic" option. It might be possible for me to write a small checking by autoconf, to check the available options, and rewrite Makefile appropriately.
But I'm afraid this project is designed to be very simple (so Makefile checks gcc-or-clang by shell command in Makefile), and it might be the way you dislike. Please could you tell me whether there is any acceptable workaround for you?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
Before all, I appreciate your implementation of xxHash with plain C90 & C++98, thank you very much, it's very helpful to use xxHash in the legacy environment!!
I have a question, "autoconf is acceptable workaround for this project to deal with the legacy compilers?" In my case, I want to use the compiler GCC-4.6, which does not have "-Wpedantic" option. It might be possible for me to write a small checking by autoconf, to check the available options, and rewrite Makefile appropriately.
But I'm afraid this project is designed to be very simple (so Makefile checks gcc-or-clang by shell command in Makefile), and it might be the way you dislike. Please could you tell me whether there is any acceptable workaround for you?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: