Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support of GML CRS classes #57

Open
10 of 13 tasks
eblondel opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 0 comments
Open
10 of 13 tasks

Support of GML CRS classes #57

eblondel opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@eblondel
Labels
GML 3.2.1 (ISO 19136:2007) new feature

Comments

@eblondel
Copy link
Owner

eblondel commented Jun 13, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.
@eblondel eblondel added this to the 0.2 milestone Jun 13, 2017
@eblondel eblondel self-assigned this Jun 13, 2017
eblondel added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 20, 2017
@eblondel
refactor abstract model + base support of GML model + GML units #55 #47
427e1aa 
#43 #28 #57 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66
@eblondel eblondel reopened this Jun 21, 2017
@eblondel eblondel changed the title Support of GML VerticalCRS Support of GML CRS classes Jun 22, 2017
eblondel added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2017
@eblondel
#70 support of GML CoordinateSystem classes (CS) + #57 start support …
f8d3ecb 
…of GML CRS classes
@eblondel eblondel mentioned this issue Jun 13, 2017
Closed
2 tasks
@eblondel eblondel removed this from the 0.2 milestone Nov 19, 2017
eblondel added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2018
@eblondel
#57 GMLTemporalCRS, GMLCompoundCRS
299c6aa
eblondel added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2018
@eblondel
#57 GMLVerticalCRS
d6ddcd0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@eblondel eblondel

Labels
GML 3.2.1 (ISO 19136:2007) new feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@eblondel