Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update omnisharp #11

Closed
akurtakov opened this issue Apr 27, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Update omnisharp #11

akurtakov opened this issue Apr 27, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@akurtakov
Copy link
Contributor

Most interesting is OmniSharp/omnisharp-node-client@bdf5757 which updates roslyn and contains a number of changes.

@mickaelistria
Copy link
Contributor

IIRC, there were some hacks I did set up on Omnisharp-node-client to work with Eclipse IDE. I'll have to diff code and see what I did change before we can upgrade smoothly.
But in any case, omnisharp-node-client should be considered as deprecated, and we're waiting for OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn#576 to have progress to adopt it ASAP.

@mickaelistria
Copy link
Contributor

Tried something at https://github.com/mickaelistria/aCute/tree/fetch-ls , but found another blocker: recent version of OmniSharp seems failing on mono: OmniSharp/omnisharp-atom#993

@mickaelistria mickaelistria self-assigned this Jun 8, 2017
@mickaelistria
Copy link
Contributor

I managed to get a newer Omnisharp working on Travis, but this seems to require mono >= 4.8 (see https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn README) whereas Fedora 25 ships mono 4.4 as latest version. So I'm not sure upgrading right now is desired.
@akurtakov thoughts?

@akurtakov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Feodra 26 has 4.8 so as soon as it's out I would say push it. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/Schedule

@mickaelistria
Copy link
Contributor

With https://github.com/mickaelistria/aCute/pull/34 , we'll move to omnisharp-node-client v0.7.0

@mickaelistria
Copy link
Contributor

Updated to 7.0.7 with mickaelistria@84dec48

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants