-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix or silence linter error "not in autoload module layout" #5
Comments
Ah, the "problem" only is that the directory containing the repository is called How do other repos deal with this? In the end, it's a sensible choice to prefix a Puppet module's repo name with |
The default rake task runs all the tests, including puppet-lint: I usually just run: rake that sets up everything. Most modules use rake tasks to run the tests with travis ci |
There are some comments on your repo from a Puppet Labs employee. puppetlabs/pdk#254 (comment) You may want to check that. (I'm not proficient and fluent in Ruby to be able to judge this properly.) |
@bittner OK, I was not aware of pdk. I'll check it out. This module could definitely use some love and updating. I still have yet to switch over to some puppet 4 conventions. It is compatible but puppet 4 throws some warnings. It is my intention to go through it and get it updated to the latest standards in the near future. I was going to compare to one of the puppetlabs modules as an example... I'll def have a look at making it compatable with pdk. |
Don't worry! PDK has been released just recently. It's the new kid on the block. |
This could likely be fixed by PR #15. |
For some reason
puppet-lint
complains that literally all the (sub)modules are somewhat broken:There's probably a sane reason for
puppet-lint
complaining. On the other hand the wholesoftware
module works just fine in the field out there.Can we fix this, or silence the complaint without running risk?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: