Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust versioning scheme #22

Closed
MoisesGSalas opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Adjust versioning scheme #22

MoisesGSalas opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MoisesGSalas
Copy link
Member

MoisesGSalas commented Jun 20, 2024

This web service is tied to the tutor-contrib-codejail and at the moment it follows the tutor versioning scheme (each major version reflects an openedx release, starting with 10->Juniper).

The main problem is that each tag in the tutor plugins must hava a mirror in the codejailservice repository, because that's how code for the image is retrieved.

I propose instead that we use something more akin to the way tutor plugins and IDAs map. IDAs (like edx_notes_api, cs_comments_service) use the open-release/<release-name>.<tag-number> for versioning and their plugins keep an additional variable that points to the open-release tag while retaining the tutor versioning system.

I think the redwood upgrade is a good opportunity for this. We can probably start using release/redwood.1 taking into account the renaming of release branches for sumac (see: Should we rename the release branches?)

@MaferMazu
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for this proposal, @MoisesGSalas. I have experienced issues with this plugin mirror versioning before, and your proposal sounds good. I agree with this proposal and using release/.

This solves eduNEXT/tutor-contrib-codejail#51

@MoisesGSalas
Copy link
Member Author

I went ahead an tagged the latest commit with the release/redwood.1 tag. I also created a branch redwood to somewhat mimic the same process as other openedx IDAs.

I also released the v18.0.0 of tutor-contrib-codejail.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants