Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Composite action vs reusable workflow #4

Open
mariajgrimaldi opened this issue Aug 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Composite action vs reusable workflow #4

mariajgrimaldi opened this issue Aug 9, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mariajgrimaldi
Copy link
Collaborator

mariajgrimaldi commented Aug 9, 2024

Consider rewriting this #1 reusable action as a composite action instead #1 (comment):

I was thinking that maybe instead of creating a workflow for building Docker images, it might be more convenient to do it as a GitHub Action. This way, each team or company could create their own workflow using the action, which would be much more flexible.

Additionally, this would allow us to easily consider the future of pushing to different Docker registries. Centralizing everything in a GitHub Action would give us the flexibility to adapt to different needs in the future without having to modify multiple workflows.

What do you think? Do you think we could evaluate the possibility of doing it as an action instead of a workflow?

Here we should have a conversation about which implementation we prefer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant