Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BOM On-call Onboarding #934

Open
4 of 10 tasks
robrap opened this issue Feb 12, 2025 · 4 comments
Open
4 of 10 tasks

BOM On-call Onboarding #934

robrap opened this issue Feb 12, 2025 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@robrap
Copy link
Contributor

robrap commented Feb 12, 2025

Follow instructions in https://2u-internal.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/AT/pages/16387065/On-Call+Arch-BOM#On-call-Onboarding

  • Robert
  • Ray
    • Review docs as details in the wiki page.
    • Verify you will see "chore: Update code-owners mapping" github notifications.
    • Attend 1-hour intro meeting (scheduled Feb 24)
    • Start ~3 week (negotiable) shadowing.
  • Bernie
    • Review docs as details in the wiki page.
    • Verify you will see "chore: Update code-owners mapping" github notifications.
    • Attend 1-hour intro meeting (scheduled Feb 24)
    • Start ~3 week (negotiable) shadowing.
@rayzhou-bit
Copy link
Member

@robrap Some questions / things I noticed from reviewing the docs:

@jristau1984 jristau1984 moved this from Ready For Development to In Progress in Arch-BOM Feb 13, 2025
@robrap
Copy link
Contributor Author

robrap commented Feb 19, 2025

@rayzhou-bit:

  1. Asgard is only accessible by SRE. I'm not sure what docs of ours mention Asgard, but we should update them to make this clear.
  2. We haven't been following that pipeline failure label process in a while.
    a. Once upon a time, there were lots of issues that we were able to resolve with retries, but we needed a system to capture and not duplicate these.
    b. We should decide whether we wish to re-educate ourselves with this process, or abandon it and update the docs. We could simply search for "gocd" or "pipeline" and hope that someone used one of these terms in the ticket.
  3. I think that google group can be retired, but not certain. See newly created ticket: Retire the arch-bom-gocd-alerts Google Group #941.

@rayzhou-bit
Copy link
Member

@robrap

Thanks for clearing those up! Asgard was mentioned on an SRE doc so it should be ok. It's linked from our GoCD runbook. I was going through the links to make sure I had access to what is needed in case anything went wrong.

@robrap
Copy link
Contributor Author

robrap commented Feb 19, 2025

@rayzhou-bit : I should also mention that Asgard is only used with EC2, so when our containerization work is complete, that will be a thing of the past.

@robrap robrap self-assigned this Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants