Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RICHEndcapN: defining constants is not the DD4hep way #749

Open
wdconinc opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

RICHEndcapN: defining constants is not the DD4hep way #749

wdconinc opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@wdconinc
Copy link
Contributor

Defining constants is not the DD4hep way - those exist in a global namespace. Naming doesn't mention RICHEndcapN_ prefix.

Originally posted by @veprbl in #743 (review)

@wdconinc wdconinc added this to the 24.08.0 milestone Jun 24, 2024
@veprbl veprbl modified the milestones: 24.08.0, 24.09.0 Aug 5, 2024
@veprbl veprbl removed this from the 24.09.0 milestone Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants