You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some projects use SMASCH to keep correspondence table. This dataset is identifiable and non-sensitive. DAISY does not have such class of sensitivity.
Describe the solution requested
Add "identifiable non-sensitive" to sensitivity classes.
Other info context
It is related to data classification procedure in general.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Imho better would be to split the field into "sensitivity" (sensitive/non-sensitive) and (re)-identifiability (identifiable, re-identifiable and non-re-identifiable).
But it also clashes with de-identification status attribute of data declaration. So more analyses is needed.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some projects use SMASCH to keep correspondence table. This dataset is identifiable and non-sensitive. DAISY does not have such class of sensitivity.
Describe the solution requested
Add "identifiable non-sensitive" to sensitivity classes.
Other info context
It is related to data classification procedure in general.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: