Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider citing relevant paper(s) in DESCRIPTION #105

Closed
mdingemanse opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Consider citing relevant paper(s) in DESCRIPTION #105

mdingemanse opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mdingemanse
Copy link
Contributor

          Given that we are citing these papers here, we should consider putting them in the Description, too. CRAN has specific requirements for citations in the description though, so let's keep that in mind:
  • Relevant citations should be included in the description. These should be in author-year style, preferably followed by an identifier such as DOI, arXiv id, or ISBN for published materials.
  • DOIs should be enclosed in angle brackets, and formatted as doi:10.prefix/suffix. Example: Sugihara (1994) doi:10.1098/rsta.1994.0106.

Originally posted by @bvreede in #89 (comment)

I think Liesenfeld & Dingemanse 2022 LREC would be a relevant cite, but don't want to suggest it is the go-to cite for talkr.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant