Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose underlying model of campaign #184

Closed
brandon-holt opened this issue Mar 26, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Expose underlying model of campaign #184

brandon-holt opened this issue Mar 26, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@brandon-holt
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, is it/would it be possible to expose the underlying model of a campaign in order to calculate predicted means and variances of a a set of new measurements (not necessarily those recommended by the campaign, but any user-specified measurement that exists within the search space)?

Ideally I'd like to be able to quantify the performance of the model on a set of known measurements as well.

Thanks!

@Scienfitz
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @brandon-holt
at the moment unfortunately it is only possible by injecting your own code eg in acquisition.py to store the otherwise non-persistent model and then further analyze it

Having said that this exact functionality is already int he works and has also been requested e.g. here #78
We will enable custom callables / extractors with pre-provided examples that do exactly what you want and more

Would you mind registering your interest in this feature in the other mentioned Issue? I would then close this one then to avoid duplicates

@Scienfitz Scienfitz added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Mar 26, 2024
@brandon-holt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Got it, will do! Thanks for the reply, looking forward to this feature!

@brandon-holt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AdrianSosic @Scienfitz Will the update allowing for model exposure also include some kind of feature importance analysis, to give us insight into which features/feature values were most useful for the model and how they influence the predictions?

@Scienfitz
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @brandon-holt

yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants