You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The graphql-java project, as this project, uses the Apache-2.0 license.
However, as you know, graphql-java used some code from this repository... and that code contained, and still contains, EPL-license copyrights at the top.
We've found out because we're using more comprehensive license checks and it came up that graphql-java is actually double-licensed, as it currently stands, due to those files.
Would you consider it ok if graphql-java removed the copyrights reference to EPL in order to make it clear that the whole project is Apache-2.0 licensed?
Hi!
The graphql-java project, as this project, uses the Apache-2.0 license.
However, as you know, graphql-java used some code from this repository... and that code contained, and still contains, EPL-license copyrights at the top.
We've found out because we're using more comprehensive license checks and it came up that graphql-java is actually double-licensed, as it currently stands, due to those files.
Would you consider it ok if graphql-java removed the copyrights reference to EPL in order to make it clear that the whole project is Apache-2.0 licensed?
Please comment on graphql-java/java-dataloader#139 if possible.
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: