Add support for storage and overhead price #750
Conversation
elmato
changed the title
…ad_price and storage_price
…when generating contract abi
elmato
changed the title
include/evm_runtime/tables.hpp
Outdated
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| VALUE_PROMOTER(uint64_t); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about
typedef uint64_t evm_version_type;
VALUE_PROMOTER(evm_version_type);
to reduce potential ambiguity.
include/evm_runtime/tables.hpp
Outdated
|
|
||
| std::optional<pending> pending_version; | ||
| uint64_t cached_version=0; | ||
| struct gas_prices { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe rename to gas_prices_type to make it consistent with consensus_parameter_data_type
Also, consider change the name "gas_prices" everywhere to avoid confusion with gas_price (no s)
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| using evmtx_type = std::variant<evmtx_v0>; | ||
| struct evmtx_v1 : evmtx_base { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shall we still keep the base price in evmtx_v3 so that it would be possible to implement the option to still use old model with high eos evm version?
|
No description provided.