You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Opportunity: What are the needs of our target user groups?
Developers and users within the EOS EVM ecosystem face challenges with a one-size-fits-all gas fee structure that doesn't account for the varying computational resources required by transactions, particularly those that are RAM-intensive. Addressing this can significantly improve cost efficiency and fairness, encouraging continued use of the network by other applications even when RAM-intensive applications have been deployed.
Strategic alignment: How does this problem align with our core strategic pillars?
Focusing on RAM-intensive transactions for gas fee adjustments aligns with our commitment to "Ease of Use" and "Fair Pricing". By optimizing gas fees for transactions based on their actual resource consumption, we support a more equitable and sustainable ecosystem for developers and users alike.
Context
Competitors: Who are our top competitors and why? How do they solve this problem today?
Competitors like Ethereum, with EIP-1559, introduce dynamic fee structures but do not specifically target RAM-intensive transaction costs because it is not part of their resource model. Our approach directly addresses the computational resource allocation, setting EOS EVM apart by optimizing network efficiency and user costs in a targeted manner.
Product differentiation: What would make our solution different?
Our solution stands out by precisely targeting RAM-intensive transactions, ensuring that gas fees more accurately reflect the actual computational resources used. This nuanced approach promotes a more balanced and fair usage of network resources that avoids punishing all operations on the network.
Solution
Solution name: RAM-Focused Gas Fee Algorithm (RFGFA)
Purpose: Define the product’s purpose briefly
RFGFA aims to recalibrate the gas fee structure within EOS EVM, specifically addressing the cost associated with RAM-intensive transactions to ensure fairness and encourage efficient network resource utilization.
Success definition: What are the top metrics for the product to define success?
Reduction in average gas fees for non-RAM-intensive transactions.
Broad adoption and positive reception from the EOS EVM community.
Assumptions
Transactions varying in RAM usage represent a significant portion of network activity.
A more equitable gas fee structure will drive increased adoption and innovation on EOS EVM.
Risks: What risks should be considered?
Potential challenges in accurately measuring and categorizing RAM usage for transactions.
Risk of unintended consequences on dApp development and usage patterns.
Business Objectives/Functionality
Implement an algorithm within EOS EVM that dynamically adjusts gas fees based on RAM usage.
User stories
As a developer, I want to optimize my dApp for efficiency, knowing that the gas fees will fairly reflect the RAM resources used.
As a user, I appreciate fairer gas fees that encourage a wider variety of dApps on the EOS EVM platform, enhancing my overall experience.
Open questions
TBD
The content you are editing has changed. Please copy your edits and refresh the page.
Gas Algorithm Update v1 (RAM-Intensive Focus)
Problem
Opportunity: What are the needs of our target user groups?
Developers and users within the EOS EVM ecosystem face challenges with a one-size-fits-all gas fee structure that doesn't account for the varying computational resources required by transactions, particularly those that are RAM-intensive. Addressing this can significantly improve cost efficiency and fairness, encouraging continued use of the network by other applications even when RAM-intensive applications have been deployed.
Strategic alignment: How does this problem align with our core strategic pillars?
Focusing on RAM-intensive transactions for gas fee adjustments aligns with our commitment to "Ease of Use" and "Fair Pricing". By optimizing gas fees for transactions based on their actual resource consumption, we support a more equitable and sustainable ecosystem for developers and users alike.
Context
Competitors: Who are our top competitors and why? How do they solve this problem today?
Competitors like Ethereum, with EIP-1559, introduce dynamic fee structures but do not specifically target RAM-intensive transaction costs because it is not part of their resource model. Our approach directly addresses the computational resource allocation, setting EOS EVM apart by optimizing network efficiency and user costs in a targeted manner.
Product differentiation: What would make our solution different?
Our solution stands out by precisely targeting RAM-intensive transactions, ensuring that gas fees more accurately reflect the actual computational resources used. This nuanced approach promotes a more balanced and fair usage of network resources that avoids punishing all operations on the network.
Solution
Solution name: RAM-Focused Gas Fee Algorithm (RFGFA)
Purpose: Define the product’s purpose briefly
RFGFA aims to recalibrate the gas fee structure within EOS EVM, specifically addressing the cost associated with RAM-intensive transactions to ensure fairness and encourage efficient network resource utilization.
Success definition: What are the top metrics for the product to define success?
Assumptions
Risks: What risks should be considered?
Business Objectives/Functionality
User stories
Open questions
Tasks
Possible future tasks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: