Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inverse is not meaningful for all cartesian types #156

Closed
domire8 opened this issue Jun 18, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Inverse is not meaningful for all cartesian types #156

domire8 opened this issue Jun 18, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@domire8
Copy link
Contributor

domire8 commented Jun 18, 2021

First of all, the inverse function is not completely implemented (related to #134).

Then, the inverse function for all subtypes return a CartesianState. And the inverse for a CartesianTwist and CartesianWrench does not make sense because you'd always need a pose to do an inverse. So they should be deleted.

For the CartesianPose it should return a pose again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant