Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

demo data request #84

Closed
biozzq opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

demo data request #84

biozzq opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@biozzq
Copy link

biozzq commented Nov 4, 2024

Hi,

Could you please let me know if there are any available raw signal data (.pod5) that I could use for practice? I am eager to see how well the process handles this issue (nanoporetech/modkit#289), and having access to such data would be immensely helpful.

Thank you very much for your assistance!

Best regards,
Zheng zhuqing

@biozzq biozzq added the question Further information is requested label Nov 4, 2024
@sarahjeeeze
Copy link
Contributor

Hi sure, there are various datasets available open source here - https://labs.epi2me.io/lc2024_t2t/

@biozzq
Copy link
Author

biozzq commented Nov 13, 2024

Dear @sarahjeeeze

Thank you. I found the Pore-C base calling BAM file (PAW44788.bam, size 88G) on the website you shared. However, I am looking for a smaller Pod5 file that I can use just for testing. I would like to start from base calling and complete the whole processing workflow (assess the methylation information for Pore-C data).

Additionally, if you could provide a reference result file to use for comparison, it would be really helpful for checking the accuracy of my workflow.

Thank you very much for your help!

Best wishes,
zheng zhuqing

@SamStudio8
Copy link
Member

Hi @biozzq - we only have the data on the EPI2ME Labs website to offer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants