Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to boost 1.85.0 or 1.86.0 #107

Open
andreas-el opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #108
Open

Update to boost 1.85.0 or 1.86.0 #107

andreas-el opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #108
Labels
christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review

Comments

@andreas-el
Copy link
Contributor

https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_85_0.html

@andreas-el andreas-el linked a pull request May 16, 2024 that will close this issue
@andreas-el
Copy link
Contributor Author

andreas-el commented May 22, 2024

I got this when updating just boost, leaving Dakota as-is. So the problem should be either in boost, or the workflow itself.

[ 85%] Building CXX object packages/pecos/src/CMakeFiles/pecos_src.dir/MeixnerOrthogPolynomial.cpp.o
In file included from /tmp/build/dakota-6.19.0-public-src-cli/src/dakota_preproc_util.cpp:11:
/tmp/build/dakota-6.19.0-public-src-cli/src/WorkdirHelper.hpp:100:48: error: no member named 'directory_iterator' in namespace 'boost::filesystem'
typedef boost::filter_iterator<MatchesWC, bfs::directory_iterator> glob_iterator;
                                          ~~~~~^

@andreas-el
Copy link
Contributor Author

We have decided to postpone this upgrade and wait for the upcoming Dakota release later in 2024.

@andreas-el andreas-el changed the title Update to boost 1.85.0 Update to boost 1.85.0 or 1.86.0 Nov 25, 2024
@andreas-el
Copy link
Contributor Author

New boost version available;
https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_86_0.html

@eivindjahren eivindjahren added the christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review label Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants