You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That is, when unpacking a release called RelPackageName.tar.gz, it expects the .rel files to be named RelPackageName.rel. The relx-generated script plays some tricks to make it work but that forces everyone to do the same when not using anything relx-specific for upgrades.
So my question is: Is there a reason relx uses RelName.rel for .rel files? Can this be changed to RelName-Vsn.rel to make the RelName-Vsn.tar.gz tar compatible with plain release_handler? Am I missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When creating a tar,
relx
produces the following structure (simplified for demonstration)in a file named
myrel-0.7.0.tar.gz
.Now, if I want to unpack that with
release_handler
, it expects the structure to look like this (note the name of the.rel
files):That is, when unpacking a release called
RelPackageName.tar.gz
, it expects the.rel
files to be namedRelPackageName.rel
. Therelx
-generated script plays some tricks to make it work but that forces everyone to do the same when not using anythingrelx
-specific for upgrades.So my question is: Is there a reason
relx
usesRelName.rel
for.rel
files? Can this be changed toRelName-Vsn.rel
to make theRelName-Vsn.tar.gz
tar compatible with plainrelease_handler
? Am I missing something?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: