Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lacking option to simulate memory correctly for LWD and SWD #18

Open
mbelda opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Lacking option to simulate memory correctly for LWD and SWD #18

mbelda opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@mbelda
Copy link
Contributor

mbelda commented Dec 1, 2023

It should be a mecanism to specify the address of memory where the input and the output for each column start. Since this is the way the CGRA works.

With the approach that is used right now, I cannot model having data on the memory and reading it through a LWD. I need to write that data on the inputs file. Even worse, if every column must read the same address, I have to duplicate the data on the input file for each column. (This gets worse with the variable increment for the LWD).

Also, for the SWD I cannot simulate where is really storing the data in the memory. So, I cannot test if I am computing the address correctly. This happens when using the SWD with variable increment, but a fix could be used also for the fixed increment SWD.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant