Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GPIO pin signal chaining (sig_in_func_X) #2700

Open
Tracked by #2492
MabezDev opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
Tracked by #2492

GPIO pin signal chaining (sig_in_func_X) #2700

MabezDev opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
1.0 non-breaking Not needed for 1.0 and can be supported without breaking the driver. peripheral:gpio GPIO peripheral

Comments

@MabezDev
Copy link
Member

MabezDev commented Dec 6, 2024

No description provided.

@bugadani
Copy link
Contributor

bugadani commented Dec 6, 2024

Why is this a 1.0-blocker?

@MabezDev
Copy link
Member Author

MabezDev commented Dec 6, 2024

Is this already possible to do?

@bugadani
Copy link
Contributor

bugadani commented Dec 6, 2024

I think technically yes, but not in a way we'd like to stabilize. But why is this a 1.0-worty feature?

@MabezDev
Copy link
Member Author

MabezDev commented Dec 6, 2024

but not in a way we'd like to stabilize
But why is this a 1.0-worty feature

It's not, but we need to know it's possible to stabilize in the future in a non-breaking way. We will be refining this list of issues with the 1.0-blocker, so don't assume we're doing it just because it has the label.

@tom-borcin tom-borcin added 1.0 non-breaking Not needed for 1.0 and can be supported without breaking the driver. and removed 1.0-blocker labels Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1.0 non-breaking Not needed for 1.0 and can be supported without breaking the driver. peripheral:gpio GPIO peripheral
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants