Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do we want the single byte read/write inherent functions? or are they optimized for the job and are much more efficient? is it a common use case? #2808

Open
Tracked by #2494
bjoernQ opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #2494

Do we want the single byte read/write inherent functions? or are they optimized for the job and are much more efficient? is it a common use case? #2808

bjoernQ opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
1.0-blocker investigation Not needed for 1.0, but don't know if we can support without breaking the driver. peripheral:spi SPI peripheral

Comments

@bjoernQ
Copy link
Contributor

bjoernQ commented Dec 13, 2024

No description provided.

@bjoernQ bjoernQ mentioned this issue Dec 13, 2024
Open
42 tasks
@bjoernQ bjoernQ added the peripheral:spi SPI peripheral label Dec 13, 2024
@tom-borcin tom-borcin added the investigation Not needed for 1.0, but don't know if we can support without breaking the driver. label Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1.0-blocker investigation Not needed for 1.0, but don't know if we can support without breaking the driver. peripheral:spi SPI peripheral
Projects
esp-rs
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bjoernQ @tom-borcin