You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Resource gbr:12642 comes has 2289 incoming citation links. However, looking at the actual manuscript identified by the DOI associated, I can't really see that many citations.
There is, indeed, some issue there, and I should have identified the problem. I’ve just noticed that gbr:12642 has three identifiers associated, that are:
Now, I remember this specific resource: the one that is usually used when the R Statistical Framework is cited in a document – that’s why there are no metadata associated with it (Crossref did not return anything). However the latter DOI associated to this resource (gid:9489845) sounded a bit odd. Thus, I’ve investigated when it has been added and from which source by accessing to its provenance information (https://w3id.org/oc/corpus/id/9489845/prov/se/1). By looking at the actual source XML file (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC5039327/fullTextXML), I’ve found the following reference from which the basic data have been extracted:
<mixed-citation publication-type="book" id="eva12394-cit-0034">
<collab collab-type="authors">R Development Core Team</collab>
<year>2014</year>
<source>R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing</source>.
<publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>.
doi: <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7”>
10.1007/978‐3‐540‐74686‐7
</ext-link>.
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.r-project.org”>
http://www.r-project.org
</ext-link>.
</mixed-citation>
As you can see in this reference there is a DOI and a URL specified, and since the OpenCitations process extract both, is where the mistake happened.
I’ve just added a new issue in the repository so as to try to avoid somehow these kinds of issues in the future, but the main point is that the error was propagated starting from the original source.
This issue has been identified by Daniel Ecer (eLife).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Resource gbr:12642 comes has 2289 incoming citation links. However, looking at the actual manuscript identified by the DOI associated, I can't really see that many citations.
There is, indeed, some issue there, and I should have identified the problem. I’ve just noticed that gbr:12642 has three identifiers associated, that are:
Now, I remember this specific resource: the one that is usually used when the R Statistical Framework is cited in a document – that’s why there are no metadata associated with it (Crossref did not return anything). However the latter DOI associated to this resource (gid:9489845) sounded a bit odd. Thus, I’ve investigated when it has been added and from which source by accessing to its provenance information (https://w3id.org/oc/corpus/id/9489845/prov/se/1). By looking at the actual source XML file (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC5039327/fullTextXML), I’ve found the following reference from which the basic data have been extracted:
As you can see in this reference there is a DOI and a URL specified, and since the OpenCitations process extract both, is where the mistake happened.
I’ve just added a new issue in the repository so as to try to avoid somehow these kinds of issues in the future, but the main point is that the error was propagated starting from the original source.
This issue has been identified by Daniel Ecer (eLife).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: