From 7f70f20b0f8248e0a0b45553be1f6de98da855e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vinh The Nguyen <34943910+athevinha@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:07:02 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] Update eip-2930.md

Improve text
---
 EIPS/eip-2930.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/EIPS/eip-2930.md b/EIPS/eip-2930.md
index c9db53a936c5c..dacac4ea709bc 100644
--- a/EIPS/eip-2930.md
+++ b/EIPS/eip-2930.md
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ However, this EIP proposes only a 10% initial discount to access lists, so there
 
 ### Transaction size bloating
 
-Average block size will increase as a result of access lists being used. However, the per-byte cost of access lists is `1900 / 32 = 59.375` for storage keys and `2400 / 20 = 120` for addresses, making it much more expensive than calldata; hence, worst-case block size will not increase. Additionally, increases in average block size will be partially compensated for by the ability to pre-fetch storage at time of receiving a transaction and/or load storage in parallel upon receiving a block.
+The average block size is expected to increase due to the use of access lists. Despite this, the cost per byte of access lists is significantly higher than that of calldata, being 1900 / 32 = 59.375 for storage keys and 2400 / 20 = 120 for addresses. Consequently, the worst-case block size will remain unaffected. Furthermore, the increase in average block size will be partially offset by the ability to pre-fetch storage upon transaction receipt and load storage in parallel when a block is received.
 
 ## Copyright
 Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](../LICENSE.md).