-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Further Refine AST #64
Comments
This opens some questions about modules and imports that I think requires a bit of thought |
modules and imports at the haskell level or for the act language itself? |
for act |
ah, yes that is quite of an interesting rabbit hole... |
Did you have some ideas in this area? I've been having some vague thoughts around being able to export only invariants, and pre/post conditions from contracts for use in proving system level properties. |
The following changes to the AST would proabaly be nice:
Contract
type that bundles all constructors / methods / invariants / storage declarations for a particular contract. It would be nice if this had some constraints on the constructors (e.g. only one passing constructor).System
type that is a collection of related contracts. In the future this could perhaps contain system level invariantsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: