You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
IMO, eipw shouldn't check whether the discussion-to link exists, just that it's on Ethereum Magicians. The link proofer should be able to tell if the thread has been created, right?
Or did the comma get parsed as some kind of array separator, and it made two separate links? In that case, yeah, eipw should be more strict.
Or did the comma get parsed as some kind of array separator, and it made two separate links? In that case, yeah, eipw should be more strict.
All special characters, unless escaped (e.g. , being %2C), should be assumed to be invalid.
Pandapip1
changed the title
discussions-to link checker isn't aggressive enough
discussions-to links must not contain unescaped special characters
Dec 25, 2022
See ethereum/EIPs#6172 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: