🐛 Fix bug in zod validators #889
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
|
Current dependencies on/for this PR:
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. |
WalkthroughThe recent updates involve formatting adjustments in type annotations within a specific function, conditional logic enhancement in a memory client related to an Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP), and a refactoring effort aimed at improving readability in procedure handling. These changes collectively enhance code clarity, compatibility, and maintainability without altering the underlying functionality. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
add_eth_call_action
branch
from
7f3d3f5 to
12d07ec
Compare
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
actions-tyypes-consistency
branch
from
1fee319 to
e5210f8
Compare
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
add_eth_call_action
branch
from
12d07ec to
2efbf39
Compare
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
actions-tyypes-consistency
branch
from
e5210f8 to
c333bf7
Compare
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
add_eth_call_action
branch
from
2efbf39 to
e6e17df
Compare
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
actions-tyypes-consistency
branch
from
c333bf7 to
c2d7451
Compare
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
add_eth_call_action
branch
from
e6e17df to
4079b62
Compare
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
actions-tyypes-consistency
branch
from
c2d7451 to
f2d2820
Compare
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
add_eth_call_action
branch
from
4079b62 to
11d1563
Compare
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
actions-tyypes-consistency
branch
from
f2d2820 to
9455c63
Compare
roninjin10
changed the title
✅ Fix build: ♻️ Regenerate
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
actions-tyypes-consistency
branch
from
9455c63 to
ec93a3f
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- extensions/viem/src/tevmViemExtension.js (5 hunks)
- packages/memory-client/src/createMemoryClient.js (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCallProcedure.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- extensions/viem/src/tevmViemExtension.js
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCallProcedure.js
Additional comments: 6
packages/memory-client/src/createMemoryClient.js (6)
- 103-105: The conditional inclusion of the
withdrawalsproperty based on the activation of EIP 4895 is correctly implemented. However, ensure that theWithdrawalDatatype is correctly imported and used here, as missing imports can lead to runtime errors.- 100-108: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The imports at the top of the file are comprehensive, covering various utilities and classes needed for the
createMemoryClientfunction. Ensure that all imported modules are used within the file to avoid unnecessary imports that can increase bundle size.
- 100-108: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [28-28]
The use of
BigIntforchainIdis appropriate given the potential size of chain IDs. However, ensure that all consuming code ofchainIdcorrectly handlesBigIntvalues, as mixingBigIntwith other numeric types without explicit conversion can lead to errors.
- 100-108: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [67-67]
The initialization of
genesisStateas an empty object is correct. However, if there's any default state that should be included in the genesis block, consider populating this object accordingly to avoid potential issues with uninitialized state.
- 100-108: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [82-82]
The creation of the
WrappedEvminstance is well-handled, with options allowing for customization of the EVM's behavior. Ensure that all options (allowUnlimitedContractSize,customPrecompiles,profiler) are thoroughly documented and tested, especially since they can significantly affect the EVM's execution.
- 108-108: The handling of
options.customPredeploysis a good feature, allowing for pre-deployment of contracts. Ensure that error handling is in place for the asynchronous operations withinPromise.all, as failures in contract pre-deployment can lead to a partially initialized state.
| header: common.genesis(), | ||
| ...(common.isActivatedEIP(4895) | ||
| ? { | ||
| withdrawals: | ||
| withdrawals: | ||
| /** @type {Array<import('@ethereumjs/util').WithdrawalData>}*/ ([]), | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| : {}), | ||
| }, | ||
| { common, setHardfork: false, skipConsensusFormatValidation: true }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [9-9]
The documentation for the createMemoryClient function is well-written, providing a clear example of how to use the function. Consider adding more details about the parameters accepted by the function and the structure of the returned MemoryClient object for improved clarity.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [33-33]
The TODO comment about using the tevm/jsonrpc package instead of viem indicates a future improvement. It's important to track this as a task in your project management tool to ensure it doesn't get overlooked.
Would you like me to open a GitHub issue to track the replacement of viem with tevm/jsonrpc?
Description
Testing
Explain the quality checks that have been done on the code changes
Additional Information
Your ENS/address:
Summary by CodeRabbit
tevmViemExtensionfunction for better readability.createMemoryClientfunction to conditionally include thewithdrawalsproperty, aligning with EIP 4895 activation.ethCallProcedurefor enhanced readability without altering its logic.