-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validation fix #105
Validation fix #105
Conversation
…ndividually and checks whether they have a check if required and not text, or have text if required and are a text input
could you please put the code on multiple lines so it is readable? |
sorry I should be more specific - can you just put the final output (here is fine, if you indent 6 lines it will "codeify") so I can look at the final rendered validation code. |
Like this? I agree, this is difficult to read.
|
Sorry! There were two bugs - missing an ending "{" and a larger bug due to the change from text to number. Both should be fixed:
Side note - I'm not actually sure how to debug effectively. I did this by creating the validator in the console with a survey open, moving it to python, adding the appropriate string completions, and testing that the string completion gave me back the working selector. Is there a way to edit expfactory-python such that I generate a webpage using the selector? |
As indicated by the circleCI test failing, this change still does not work: Debugging means doing whatever you must do in order to test the functionality. In this case, it's pretty easy to install expfactory:
and then try previewing a survey. Please test this properly and then update the PR. |
Ah, of course. I'll try that. On Tuesday, April 5, 2016, Vanessa Sochat [email protected] wrote:
Best, |
Great! Thanks. |
…ue where each checkbox is recorded separately. Not a big deal, but annoying.
No description provided.