You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have published my own script for scraping zubairalizai.com, and the correctly scraped files (including Sheikh Zubair Ali Zai's gradings and explanations) can be found in my repository.
It may be helpful to add a JSON object with Sheikh Zubair Ali Zai's explanations to the scraped data. Sometimes, he classifies a hadith as da'if (weak) but explicitly states in the "description" that the hadith before is establishing this hadith, as in this example.
If we were to include the grade in one JSON object and the description in another, we could display the simple grading with an info button next to it. If someone clicks on the info button, they would be able to see why Sheikh Zubair Ali Zai graded the isnad as da'if and any additional information if the meaning of this hadith is still correct.
I am mentioning this idea now because you are already thinking about structure changes and this would be an improvement we should discuss as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As-salamu alaykum,
I have published my own script for scraping zubairalizai.com, and the correctly scraped files (including Sheikh Zubair Ali Zai's gradings and explanations) can be found in my repository.
It may be helpful to add a JSON object with Sheikh Zubair Ali Zai's explanations to the scraped data. Sometimes, he classifies a hadith as da'if (weak) but explicitly states in the "description" that the hadith before is establishing this hadith, as in this example.
If we were to include the grade in one JSON object and the description in another, we could display the simple grading with an info button next to it. If someone clicks on the info button, they would be able to see why Sheikh Zubair Ali Zai graded the isnad as da'if and any additional information if the meaning of this hadith is still correct.
I am mentioning this idea now because you are already thinking about structure changes and this would be an improvement we should discuss as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: