-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Standard format #1
Comments
Yes I actually started re-naming some of the recipes yesterday, but I didn't finish. I defiantly agree a standard naming convention is needed. I also plan on adding category folders with a selection dialogue in the plugin. I had initially gone with a more descriptive |
It would be good to have them end in .json so that editors can do the proper indentation and syntax highlighting. Also, it might allow for different formats of the recipes, because JSON doesn't allow for comments and these recipes desperately need to be commented to help future maintenance. |
I've changed all the files to .json format and added a change to the Recipe manager to remove the .json from the file-name for ease of reading. As for comments, until I have a chance to really re-work the storage back-end stuff any key value pare can be used in the config for comment saving. "example.tld": {
"type": "readability",
"comments": "Add a filter rule in TT-RSS to drop pages with tag 'bad article'",
"prependimage": true,
"appendimages": true
} I've also settled on a |
I noticed some recipe file names end with tld (e.g. arstechnica.com) and some file names do not have one (e.g. zdnet).
Can we make this a standard for file names?
domain.tld
As for the case of different recipes on the same domain (e.g. heise.de)
Maybe restructure the config like this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: